Back to Top

Officer Found Not Guilty In Questionable Deadly Force Use

Please thank The Wilderness Tactical Products for bringing us today’s video of Officer Found Not Guilty In Questionable Deadly Force Use! To get the ankle IFAK for only $35, sign up here: https://get-asp.com/ankleIFAK and check out their belts here: https://get-asp.com/widlernessbelts. The Wilderness is a fantastic small business and I buy their products myself. Cover Your ASP Tour: https://get-asp.com/dpth If you want to train and get better at real life self-defense, join us on the ASP Extra channel to learn how to respond to situations like Officer Found Not Guilty In Questionable Deadly Force Use! http://www.youtube.com/activeselfprotectionextra Raw video with full audio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YrX9kURci0 Initial news story: http://get-asp.com/winl Results of trial: http://get-asp.com/yvt9 Need a Quality Holster? Here are a few that we recommend: Full Kydex Dark Star Gear – https://get-asp.com/darkstar Henry Holsters – https://get-asp.com/henryholsters KSG Armory – https://get-asp.com/KSGArmory Three Quarter Kydex Black Arch Protos M – https://get-asp.com/protos For more information – https://get-asp.com/holsters ASP merch is now in stock in the store…go get a newly designed limited edition ASP polo! http://get-asp.com/store If you value what we do at ASP, would you consider becoming an ASP Patron Member to support the work it takes to make the narrated videos like Officer Found Not Guilty In Questionable Deadly Force Use? https://get-asp.com/patron or https://get-asp.com/patron-annual gives the details and benefits. Raw video: https://youtu.be/SUhNJ9JGCQU Attitude. Skills. Plan. ASP Sponsors and Recommended Products: https://activeselfprotection.com/recommended-products-and-sponsors/ (music in the outro courtesy of Bensound at http://www.bensound.com) Copyright Disclaimer. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Comments

Active Self Protection says:

For those saying he should have shot him in the legs, no. Stop. Leg shots are a bad idea. Here are three reasons why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wayM60obR6U

Jim Erickson says:

HOLY FUCKING HEADPHONE WARNING

oilfortheworld says:

So many words. A Cop shoot the trash and he is dead OK end.

Quick Stepz says:

Americans need to learn the ENGLISH Dictionary, not the American one.

Stop might be a word you might want to learn.

He said kill me! changing the words to don't move, ain't going to change his mind.

Should have shot earlier when you had better aim, to shoot out some legs.

oilfortheworld says:

What a shit Gun!!!

RuthlessTony says:

Boy is lucky it was a one and done. Took him a decade to clear that thing. Other than that, that was clean.

Craving Cheddar says:

The officer sounds so scared

Paul SC says:

John, do you agree that the round that jammed his gun sounded weak? It sounded like a low powder round, and that's why it didn't eject fully

sed6 says:

Your IFAK sign up is busted…

lacruiser says:

Clothes were too thick for a tazer. No room to back up, too many obstacles behind him and with the guy walking toward him no time to look. The outcome was the only outcome.

Curtis Flynn says:

Good shoot.

Shirosake says:

This is why you don't cut stupid windows and shit in carry guns. If that guy was armed or didn't get a square hit, the officer would have been toast.

James Diaz says:

This is why I can’t be a police officer; how is that not justified with just a look a the bodycam?! Now this cop has’ to go to court and spend money & his own time.. tough job with low pay, jeez! Still good outcome overall & great police work.

J R says:

Hey John, long time subscriber here. I'm sorry….I do not see any reason at all to use deadly force in this instance. I heard all the lead up to and initial priming of the situation and still, I can not get myself to understand this officers undisciplined decision. I have spoken to my leo friends and less than leathal would have been primary option due to.1) Hands are in plain sight and empty. 2) Mental issues from the start was obvious by the guy calling for a suicide by cop. 3) There was no immediate sign of a deadly threat. What I see from the video is that this officer was new and untrained. He seemed nervous and unseasoned. I believe his fear of the situation, nerves, and adrenalin got the best of him. Not Not defending the perp here, in any way…… but also can't justify the use of deadly force in this one. Thanks John, keep them coming.

Amos Tutuola says:

Why did he shoot him in the heart? Unnecessary death…

Tadd Spencer says:

If the police truly knew how to self defend, shooting an unarmed person wouldn't be necessary at all, it's obvious in soooooo many scenarios I've seen of unarmed perps in lethal shootings the police could have and should have used self defense instead of lethal force. So many police are not trained properly and it shows and people are losing their lives because of it, and every time they say it's justified….I don't see any killing of an unarmed man justified at all, and if people do they are complete idiots.

skankhunt 45 says:

Keep track of where all these terrorists live in your area then when hopefully in our lifetime another country like Russia or China invades we can give them the addresses.

Reply to James Diaz Cancel reply

*