Clerk Tries To Stop Robbery And Shoots Innocent Bystander
Please thank Firearms Legal Protection for sponsoring today’s video of Clerk Tries To Stop Robbery And Shoots Innocent Bystander! Sign up for the free newsletter at http://firearmslegal.com/flp-newsletter
Firearms Legal Protection offers special discounts to ASP fans at http://get-asp.com/flp ; I prefer and have their premium plan. Check out their FB page at https://www.facebook.com/firearmslegal and their YT channel at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoI7CJv90REnAqtfOTwUyUQ
Find the Good, Sane, Sober, Moral, Prudent Person playlist on the ASP Extra channel here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCOsJdIjjYqFD_iqJMk8wghARcU6v5qBu
News stories:
https://get-asp.com/w8c1
https://get-asp.com/bvqu
Raw video:
There are no raw videos.
ASP Sponsors and Recommended Products: https://activeselfprotection.com/recommended-products-and-sponsors/
If you value what we do at ASP, would you consider becoming an ASP Patron Member to support making videos like Clerk Tries To Stop Robbery And Shoots Innocent Bystander? https://get-asp.com/patron or https://get-asp.com/patron-annual gives the details and benefits.
Copyright Disclaimer. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Attitude. Skills. Plan.
How is it attempted murder.. when we all know if the roles were reversed the robber wouldn't be charged with attempted murder. The justice system is confusing
Thank you for these mental reps every day! I have a firearm on me every day at work and every day when I'm not at work. Its nice to keep these lessons fresh, though in this case i hope my common sense would have prevailed lol
Have US cities really got so bad that we need to put clerks in a safe room. Jesus, we really need to get rid of these felons. Armed robbery should be a death sentence or at least 50 years in prison. Robberies would be cut down significantly and we’d get scum off our earth
These are the types of people that shouldn't have guns. The guy with his hands full of chips & soda wasn't a threat. What was he gonna do? Throw a beef jerky stick at him?
I have one question & one question only. If someone is stealing from your general store via a grab an go [MEANING: They run in and run out with no weapons in there hands to carry the maxima amount of product] a deadly threat? Could that person who just ran in and who is now running out with hands full of merchandise a deadly threat?
John, I got my wilderness belt today after using your link. That's a very nice belt! Premium price, but that is premium quality! I had my doubts the size was right after pulling it out of the box but the measurement instructions they gave on the website was perfect!
I’m not sure attempted murder is the right charge. Felonious buffoonery? I mean felonious buffoonery causing serious wounding. I might vote for making that a higher charge than attempted murder.
oh did I SHOOT YOU ? here, have some chips. take two. want a soda ? whatever you want, just leave and please don't tell the cops I shot you. pleeeeease.
I dunno where I stand on this one. One the one hand, the idiot didn't hit the thieves, and instead managed to wound someone he wasn't shooting at. Yeah, that's bad, and he probably should lose the right to own a gun at a minimum, maybe serve some time in prison. I'll echo the guy below who pointed out that if the thieves had shot at him, the charges would undoubtedly be milder. I get that shooting at someone over a few bags of chips or whatever is "immoral" in that human life is somehow sacred, no matter how heinous the crime that human life commits. I also get that theft isn't that serious. We pretty much all tried to shoplift something when we were kids (I got caught, but was only made to pay for it). That being said, I keep repeating: the way we're going, we're essentially legalizing theft, and that legalization is going to have bad consequences, even short term. San Francisco is going to be a ghost town in a few years. The offices are emptying out and the shops and restaurants are closing, mostly because of theft and violent assaults. If you're not a professional cop or whatever, it's a bit much to expect someone to only properly escalate force according to some scale, where you have to wait for the other guy to do something in order for you to retaliate. If he pulls a knife and is close enough to you, you can shoot him (provided you live somewhere where you can legally carry one) but only of course if he doesn't stab you to death first. I don't think the guy here acted appropriately, in that he left his "cage" in order to confront these guys. However, every solution I can come up with to this situation involves the store owner spending money to upgrade the security measures…and in my mind he shouldn't have to. Not everyone leads a 9-5 life and can afford to do all their shopping during the day, leaving the night to punks who have nowhere to rob because nothing's open. The streets, and our world, need to be a lot safer than they are. I don't think this guy found the right solution; I also don't think legalizing theft (which is essentially what we're doing) is the solution either.
The clerk had "no intention to murder" the bystander so it will be not guilty, unless they wise up and change it to negligent discharge of a weapon, or something similar. Intent, intent, and intent is always the key. That clerk needs to go to a shooting range, and practice.
I imagine the attempted murder charge relates to attempting to shoot the fleeing shoplifters, not hitting the innocent man, per se. Since the shoplifters didn't pose a lethal threat (per the law) shooting at them was not legal. He probably could have been charged with attempted murder even if the innocent man wasn't hit, if the authorities had found out.
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Appropriate to charge clerk!
Guilty of depraved wounding.
I want to see the cop with the hot pink nails that searched him
I don't want to be sober or anything. I want to shave my face and ass so I don't look like John. If you think such a beard is cool review your videos.
How is it attempted murder.. when we all know if the roles were reversed the robber wouldn't be charged with attempted murder. The justice system is confusing
The Average person has had enough, incidents like this will happen more often as America falls apart.
Fair charge for sure.
Guns are for killing.
They couldn’t pay me enough to shoot someone for stealing snacks
Thank you for these mental reps every day! I have a firearm on me every day at work and every day when I'm not at work. Its nice to keep these lessons fresh, though in this case i hope my common sense would have prevailed lol
Transferred intent—attempted murder is probably the correct charge here imo
He tried to buy him off with chips and snacks?
Innocent bystander did not take his offer because he offered a free case of Bud Light.
That one handed shooting 🤦🏽
The real question on everyone's mind is: What's up with the new 'doo, John?
Have US cities really got so bad that we need to put clerks in a safe room. Jesus, we really need to get rid of these felons. Armed robbery should be a death sentence or at least 50 years in prison. Robberies would be cut down significantly and we’d get scum off our earth
These are the types of people that shouldn't have guns. The guy with his hands full of chips & soda wasn't a threat. What was he gonna do? Throw a beef jerky stick at him?
I have one question & one question only. If someone is stealing from your general store via a grab an go [MEANING: They run in and run out with no weapons in there hands to carry the maxima amount of product] a deadly threat? Could that person who just ran in and who is now running out with hands full of merchandise a deadly threat?
John, I got my wilderness belt today after using your link. That's a very nice belt! Premium price, but that is premium quality! I had my doubts the size was right after pulling it out of the box but the measurement instructions they gave on the website was perfect!
itll get knocked down to reckless endangerment with a fireaarm and greivious bodily wounds drujnk cant type
Attempted murder for wounding or for shooting at the thieves? The thieves are the ones whom he attempted to kill.
I’m not sure attempted murder is the right charge. Felonious buffoonery? I mean felonious buffoonery causing serious wounding. I might vote for making that a higher charge than attempted murder.
oh did I SHOOT YOU ? here, have some chips. take two. want a soda ? whatever you want, just leave and please don't tell the cops I shot you. pleeeeease.
fucking lol
I dunno where I stand on this one. One the one hand, the idiot didn't hit the thieves, and instead managed to wound someone he wasn't shooting at. Yeah, that's bad, and he probably should lose the right to own a gun at a minimum, maybe serve some time in prison. I'll echo the guy below who pointed out that if the thieves had shot at him, the charges would undoubtedly be milder.
I get that shooting at someone over a few bags of chips or whatever is "immoral" in that human life is somehow sacred, no matter how heinous the crime that human life commits. I also get that theft isn't that serious. We pretty much all tried to shoplift something when we were kids (I got caught, but was only made to pay for it). That being said, I keep repeating: the way we're going, we're essentially legalizing theft, and that legalization is going to have bad consequences, even short term. San Francisco is going to be a ghost town in a few years. The offices are emptying out and the shops and restaurants are closing, mostly because of theft and violent assaults. If you're not a professional cop or whatever, it's a bit much to expect someone to only properly escalate force according to some scale, where you have to wait for the other guy to do something in order for you to retaliate. If he pulls a knife and is close enough to you, you can shoot him (provided you live somewhere where you can legally carry one) but only of course if he doesn't stab you to death first.
I don't think the guy here acted appropriately, in that he left his "cage" in order to confront these guys. However, every solution I can come up with to this situation involves the store owner spending money to upgrade the security measures…and in my mind he shouldn't have to. Not everyone leads a 9-5 life and can afford to do all their shopping during the day, leaving the night to punks who have nowhere to rob because nothing's open. The streets, and our world, need to be a lot safer than they are. I don't think this guy found the right solution; I also don't think legalizing theft (which is essentially what we're doing) is the solution either.
Attempted murder?
Jordan Neely's killier gets charged with light manslaughter
He shoots him and offers chips LOL
need more guns ?
The clerk had "no intention to murder" the bystander so it will be not guilty, unless they wise up and change it to negligent discharge of a weapon, or something similar. Intent, intent, and intent is always the key. That clerk needs to go to a shooting range, and practice.
yikes ! 😢
lol Rookie. BOOM
I imagine the attempted murder charge relates to attempting to shoot the fleeing shoplifters, not hitting the innocent man, per se. Since the shoplifters didn't pose a lethal threat (per the law) shooting at them was not legal. He probably could have been charged with attempted murder even if the innocent man wasn't hit, if the authorities had found out.