My issue is the NRA being a civil rights movement and advocating for limiting liability laws. Is now selling insurance for their failures to get those laws repealed. That is the ultimate in conflict of interest. Adam, love your video's, even the dry ones!! Thank you for the service you provide.
This is bullshit, the NRA and other pro 2A groups should be pushing the opposite. But since the 2A movement has cut a deal with (insert names here) if you choose to carry and use your firearm now you could be sucked dry by the "lawyers" and put in jail, so insert the IV needle and pay up monthly or you are screwed. You see, the 2A is really only for the rich!
if it's ruled justified you should immediately have full immunity from any and all legal bullshit from that point on!!! these civil parasites should be shit out of luck!!! and you should demand the sheriff do the investigation!!!
sorry, but this was one of the weaker legal briefs. I'd rather have heard a discussion on the merits of self defense insurance & whether or not having it in the first place makes it seem like you are planning to shoot someone rather than avoiding a shooting.
the other question is how does a firearms focused service compare with a general legal service like prepaid legal or legal zoom? given that I likely will never have a situation where a firearm is used but every couple of years need some form of legal advice. What do I gain?
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Damn click bait….WHERE IS CHUCK NORRIS
It was a good breakdown but it would have been even better had you laid out the differences between the big brands you mentioned.
I want Taco Bell now.
No Dana won't sway my decision at all. Oh wait…
where does u.s. law shield fall in all of this?
My issue is the NRA being a civil rights movement and advocating for limiting liability laws. Is now selling insurance for their failures to get those laws repealed. That is the ultimate in conflict of interest. Adam, love your video's, even the dry ones!! Thank you for the service you provide.
holy crap this video maybe just not want to carry
This is bullshit, the NRA and other pro 2A groups should be pushing the opposite. But since the 2A movement has cut a deal with (insert names here) if you choose to carry and use your firearm now you could be sucked dry by the "lawyers" and put in jail, so insert the IV needle and pay up monthly or you are screwed. You see, the 2A is really only for the rich!
if it's ruled justified you should immediately have full immunity from any and all legal bullshit from that point on!!! these civil parasites should be shit out of luck!!! and you should demand the sheriff do the investigation!!!
Your screwed if you shoot and your screwed if you don't.
sorry, but this was one of the weaker legal briefs. I'd rather have heard a discussion on the merits of self defense insurance & whether or not having it in the first place makes it seem like you are planning to shoot someone rather than avoiding a shooting.
the other question is how does a firearms focused service compare with a general legal service like prepaid legal or legal zoom? given that I likely will never have a situation where a firearm is used but every couple of years need some form of legal advice. What do I gain?
The NRA's cover would that be like the Life membership I paid for ?? Paid in April/2013 now it's July/2017 and I'm still waiting for it to turn up !