Riverside Officer Responds To Felon In Possession Of A Firearm
Please thank POM Pepper Sprays for bringing us today’s video of Riverside Officer Responds To Felon In Possession Of A Firearm! Find them at https://get-asp.com/POM and order your less lethal tool today. POM makes a great product and we are glad to have them as a sponsor here at Active Self Protection.
2021 ASP National Conference: https://get-asp.com/ASPNC
Check out the ASP Instructor Certification Program at: https://www.aspinstructors.com/
Cover Your ASP Tour: https://get-asp.com/dpth
ASP Extra: http://youtube.com/activeselfprotectionextra
ASP Community Standards: https://activeselfprotection.com/page-guidelines/
Need a Quality Holster? Here are a few that we recommend:
Full Kydex
Dark Star Gear – https://get-asp.com/darkstar
Henry Holsters – https://get-asp.com/henryholsters
KSG Armory – https://get-asp.com/KSGArmory
Three Quarter Kydex
Zero9 – http://get-asp.com/zero9
PHLster – http://get-asp.com/phlster
Black Arch Protos M – https://get-asp.com/protos
For more information – https://get-asp.com/holsters
ASP merch is now in stock in the store…go get a newly designed limited edition ASP polo! http://get-asp.com/store
If you value what we do at ASP, would you consider becoming an ASP Patron Member to support the work it takes to make the narrated videos like Riverside Officer Responds To Felon In Possession Of A Firearm? https://get-asp.com/patron or https://get-asp.com/patron-annual gives the details and benefits.
Raw video: https://youtu.be/Q7Oo3lNCyC8
Attitude. Skills. Plan.
ASP Sponsors and Recommended Products: https://activeselfprotection.com/recommended-products-and-sponsors/
(music in the outro courtesy of Bensound at http://www.bensound.com)
Copyright Disclaimer. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
1. Look at the still of the suspect "grabbing the gun" versus the gun "retrieved." Whats the difference? Look at the grip of the Taurus. There is a smooth diagonal line and dark stippling. Look at what the suspect grabbed. There is no diagonal line. Its smooth all around. Plus you have to look at how the light reflects off the object. Its smooth as hell with no significant details. On top of that, look at the suspect's finger positioning as he holds the object. Does that look like someone grabbing a gun out their jacket? No. He's pinching something with his thumb, middle finger and ring finger. Go to the actual police video and you will see the discrepancy. And I notice this channel doesnt all links nor timestamps in the comment. They dont want people to call out the blatant BS. And notice how the commentators keep driving home the guy's social status just to remind you that he's a felon. They aren't objective. They are subjective.
2. When they were "retrieving" the gun, notice whats in the upper right? A stuffed wallet. Contours look mighty similar. Why is the wallet on the ground? The light reflecting off of it is quite similar to the still and I bet you the other side is smooth as well.
3. This is a coverup, because they wont post the complete unedited version. Instead, they do these cuts with commentary as a means to trim out critical information and to cover up the dirt. When its a bonafide legit shooting, the police dont edit, because the video will speak for itself. They'll play it in all of its entirety to show the public a shooting was justified. But when its not, the police will chop it up, degrade video quality and use other tricks in hopes nobody catches on.
4. The other problem with this video is that its just ONE body cam. The public needs to see ALL body cams involved. And dont think the public dont know the tricks the police uses, like trying to obscure the visuals just like cops love gripping their vests to hide their names. I've worn vests in the military. Its not a natural rest position to put more weight on your torso that you are already carrying.
5. Unless the suspect is big like Shaq, I highly doubt he had a wallet AND a Taurus in his jacket pocket.
Hey asp quick question, now I'm a young gun and I'm learning self defense here, but I was wondering what should I do if I'm alone (as a private gun owner citizen) and a group of people ( let's say about 10 people especially in places like Seattle and Portland) what should I do
Meh! A convicted felon in possession of a firearm who goes for his firearm as he is being approached by known police officers in broad daylight but then has second thoughts at the very last moment…..this is not a bad shoot. This called an occupational hazard on the part of the criminal. Next time, if there is a next time, the criminal needs to immediately put his hands in the air and do as the police say.
Would like to see this compared and analyzed to the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. From the video clips I've seen it sure looks like a 'bad' shoot in her case.
Not only is this cop a terrible shot he has no self-control anyone else were to do that it would be attempted murder whata broken system America at its finest
Uh @4:40 -ish you say he's pulled the gun then freeze the vid to talk a bit… you can clearly ( I think, from what I can see) see the dude did not pull a gun, right?
I never gasped at anything before on this channel. Yes I understand that they're on high alert knowing that he's armed, but the cops seemed a bit trigger happy.
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Bad shoot. Jack boots get fucked
cop shouldn't have fired.
Cop had 999ms ping
Not a good shoot
Not a clean shot not a good shoot. Making felons millions by the bullet.
Not a good shoot. But comon you pull a gun on a cop what do you expect to happen
man get's shot for exercising his 2nd amendment rights
This is a coverup. Walk with me:
1. Look at the still of the suspect "grabbing the gun" versus the gun "retrieved." Whats the difference? Look at the grip of the Taurus. There is a smooth diagonal line and dark stippling. Look at what the suspect grabbed. There is no diagonal line. Its smooth all around. Plus you have to look at how the light reflects off the object. Its smooth as hell with no significant details. On top of that, look at the suspect's finger positioning as he holds the object. Does that look like someone grabbing a gun out their jacket? No. He's pinching something with his thumb, middle finger and ring finger. Go to the actual police video and you will see the discrepancy. And I notice this channel doesnt all links nor timestamps in the comment. They dont want people to call out the blatant BS. And notice how the commentators keep driving home the guy's social status just to remind you that he's a felon. They aren't objective. They are subjective.
2. When they were "retrieving" the gun, notice whats in the upper right? A stuffed wallet. Contours look mighty similar. Why is the wallet on the ground? The light reflecting off of it is quite similar to the still and I bet you the other side is smooth as well.
3. This is a coverup, because they wont post the complete unedited version. Instead, they do these cuts with commentary as a means to trim out critical information and to cover up the dirt. When its a bonafide legit shooting, the police dont edit, because the video will speak for itself. They'll play it in all of its entirety to show the public a shooting was justified. But when its not, the police will chop it up, degrade video quality and use other tricks in hopes nobody catches on.
4. The other problem with this video is that its just ONE body cam. The public needs to see ALL body cams involved. And dont think the public dont know the tricks the police uses, like trying to obscure the visuals just like cops love gripping their vests to hide their names. I've worn vests in the military. Its not a natural rest position to put more weight on your torso that you are already carrying.
5. Unless the suspect is big like Shaq, I highly doubt he had a wallet AND a Taurus in his jacket pocket.
EH my friend chucky said you getting chubby again. hahaha….nah good stuff though.
So his hands are out of his pocket and up, gun still in his pocket yet you shoot him?
Hey asp quick question, now I'm a young gun and I'm learning self defense here, but I was wondering what should I do if I'm alone (as a private gun owner citizen) and a group of people ( let's say about 10 people especially in places like Seattle and Portland) what should I do
Yeah, not a good shoot. The guy had his hands up when the cop shot him. The guy may be a scumbag but it doesn't mean cops can just murder him.
Meh! A convicted felon in possession of a firearm who goes for his firearm as he is being approached by known police officers in broad daylight but then has second thoughts at the very last moment…..this is not a bad shoot. This called an occupational hazard on the part of the criminal. Next time, if there is a next time, the criminal needs to immediately put his hands in the air and do as the police say.
That dude is long overdue!
Would like to see this compared and analyzed to the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. From the video clips I've seen it sure looks like a 'bad' shoot in her case.
That guy is lucky to still be alive today, He's gonna kill before He's taken out, lock his ass for as long as possible
Lessons learned: you are a freaking Felon, dont carry weapons and you wont loose your life. What a dumbell!!
John never gives the exact details that are important like the type of firearm and caliber used. John needs another ASP tattoo to promote his channel
Lesson of the day. Don't be a criminal. Things like this, won't be apart of your career decision. This outcome comes with the job.
Not only is this cop a terrible shot he has no self-control anyone else were to do that it would be attempted murder whata broken system America at its finest
You guys hosting this are cucks lol I can tell you wanted to defend this shot so bad but you know you'd get called out quick Clowns…
Perp went from drawing a gun to hands in the air in a fraction of a second. Stop action makes it seem a lot longer.
Uh @4:40 -ish you say he's pulled the gun then freeze the vid to talk a bit… you can clearly ( I think, from what I can see) see the dude did not pull a gun, right?
I never gasped at anything before on this channel.
Yes I understand that they're on high alert knowing that he's armed, but the cops seemed a bit trigger happy.
I love you and your videos John and most of the time I agree with your assessment. But this officer was way way to fast to shoot.